DPhil Seminar (Wednesday - Week 1, HT26)

chess king white background victory shadow black 1418482 pxhere com

Abstract: Perceptualists and Inferentialists offer opposing accounts of social cognition: do we directly perceive others’ mental states or infer them? Despite their disagreement, both camps assume an immutability thesis: while there might be superficial differences across contexts and individuals, core descriptions of social experience remain constant. Perceptual theorists tend to treat these descriptions as authoritative guides to social cognition, while Inferentialists regard them as irrelevant or systematically misleading. This paper challenges that assumption. I argue that phenomenological description is not immutable but is modulated by what we know. While our social experiences may remain broadly similar, how we describe and interpret them can change as our conceptual and scientific understanding develops. To support this claim, I draw an analogy with work on intuitive physics, where increased knowledge reshapes how ordinary physical phenomena are experienced and described. Recognizing the variability of phenomenological description helps reframe debates in social cognition and clarifies the role phenomenology should play in theorizing about other minds.

Registration: If you do not hold a university card, please contact the seminar convenor or admin@philosophy.ox.ac.uk at least two working days before a seminar to register your attendance.

See the DPhil Seminar website for details.


DPhil Seminar Convenor: Oscar Monroy Perez