Metaphysics and Epistemology Group (Tuesday - Week 4, MT22)
Many theories of epistemic rationality make no special dispensations for cognitive limitations. As a result, they often make demands that only cognitively ideal agents could satisfy. But none of us is, or ever will be, cognitively ideal. This gives rise to a question: given that we can’t think like cognitively ideal agents, how should we think? In this talk, I’ll sketch the outlines of a reliabilist theory of non-ideal epistemic rationality, which attempts to answer this question, and argue that, if it is on the right track, the recently popular idea that the standards of non-ideal epistemic rationality are fixed by social conventions cannot be right.
If you would like to be added to the mailing list, used to advertise upcoming sessions and other metaphysics and epistemology activities in the university, please email email@example.com.
Metaphysics and Epistemology Group Convenors: Nick Hughes, Nick Jones and Alex Kaiserman